MATERIALI
"Tra il dire e il welfare. Lo stato sociale nel mare della crisi – esperienze e idee per un
nuovo welfare equo e partecipato"
When is it right to
Smack a Child?
Clinical Social Work Research Survey
Di Rosanna Fattibene
Igienisti
dentali. Unid: "Portare a termine iter su riconoscimento Albo professionale"
Health Costs For Seniors In Canada
Rising Slowly: Points Way To Medicare Solvency
http://mnt.to/a/492W
A study published in Archives of Internal Medicine finds that per capita Medicare spending on the elderly has grown nearly three times faster in the United States than in Canada since 1980. (Canada's program, which covers all Canadians, not just the elderly, is also called Medicare.
http://mnt.to/a/492W
A study published in Archives of Internal Medicine finds that per capita Medicare spending on the elderly has grown nearly three times faster in the United States than in Canada since 1980. (Canada's program, which covers all Canadians, not just the elderly, is also called Medicare.
PROGETTI ONLUS
«I care with a smile»: arriva
la terapia del sorriso a Napoli
Il progetto
mira alla ricerca di una dimensione di benessere che modifichi le visioni
negative della vita
European Healthcare Learning Tour (2012-2013): visit the best European
hospitals
Discover New Realities to Develop New
Skills in Healthcare Management
9 December 2012/September 2013
http://www.lbs.luiss.it/paesanita/healthcare-learning-tour
9 December 2012/September 2013
http://www.lbs.luiss.it/paesanita/healthcare-learning-tour
Responsabilità amministrativa per società a prevalente o
totale partecipazione pubblica
ANTONIO VETRO, Problematica sulla giurisdizione in tema di responsabilità nei confronti della p.a. degli amministratori e dipendenti delle società con partecipazione pubblica, alla luce della giurisprudenza della Corte dei conti, della Corte costituzionale, del Consiglio di Stato e della Cassazione*.
http://www.lexitalia.it/p/12/vetro_giurisdizione2.htm
ANTONIO VETRO, Problematica sulla giurisdizione in tema di responsabilità nei confronti della p.a. degli amministratori e dipendenti delle società con partecipazione pubblica, alla luce della giurisprudenza della Corte dei conti, della Corte costituzionale, del Consiglio di Stato e della Cassazione*.
http://www.lexitalia.it/p/12/vetro_giurisdizione2.htm
Bocciatura dello
schema di Decreto con le nuove Tabelle di Invalidità Civile, da parte della
Commissione Affari Sociali della Camera
|
HEALTH
Scott Gottlieb | New York Post
Women, like all of us under the thumb of
Obamacare, risk losing far more than they'll gain.
|
HEALTH
Jon Entine |
Forbes
rivista quadrimestrale “Diritto, Economia e Tecnologie
della Privacy” - SETTEMBRE/OTTOBRE 2012
Argomenti
MARCO QUADRELLI
L’accesso ai dati e la loro riservatezza nell’azione del servizio sociale
MARCO QUADRELLI
L’accesso ai dati e la loro riservatezza nell’azione del servizio sociale
NADIA MARTINI
Privacy e telemedicina: problematiche giuridiche e soluzioni pratiche nella prassi degli operatori.
Privacy e telemedicina: problematiche giuridiche e soluzioni pratiche nella prassi degli operatori.
www.istitutoitalianoprivacy.it
James C. Capretta and Thomas
P. Miller | Economics21
1 in 4 Small Biz Without
Health Insurance
By Andrew
Lu on October 15, 2012 5:45 AM | No TrackBacks
LEGISLAZIONE
Riorganizzazione dell'Associazione italiana
della Croce Rossa
DECRETO LEGISLATIVO 28 settembre 2012, n. 178 (in G.U. n. 245 del 19 ottobre 2012 - in vigore dal 3 novembre 2012) - Riorganizzazione dell'Associazione italiana della Croce Rossa (C.R.I.), a norma dell'articolo 2 della legge 4 novembre 2010, n. 183.
DECRETO LEGISLATIVO 28 settembre 2012, n. 178 (in G.U. n. 245 del 19 ottobre 2012 - in vigore dal 3 novembre 2012) - Riorganizzazione dell'Associazione italiana della Croce Rossa (C.R.I.), a norma dell'articolo 2 della legge 4 novembre 2010, n. 183.
Decreto-legge in materia sanitaria
DECRETO-LEGGE 13 settembre 2012, n. 158* (in G.U. n. 214 del 13 settembre 2012 - in vigore dal 14 settembre 2012) - Disposizioni urgenti per promuovere lo sviluppo del Paese mediante un più alto livello di tutela della salute.
DECRETO-LEGGE 13 settembre 2012, n. 158* (in G.U. n. 214 del 13 settembre 2012 - in vigore dal 14 settembre 2012) - Disposizioni urgenti per promuovere lo sviluppo del Paese mediante un più alto livello di tutela della salute.
GIURISPRUDENZA
Tar Molise, 3 marzo 2011, n. 95
Possono i cittadini e le associazioni determinare l'interesse pubblico?
Diritto di accesso (alla cartella clinica detenuta da un ente
ecclesiastico)
TAR PUGLIA - LECCE SEZ. II - sentenza 5 ottobre 2012 (sulla sussistenza o meno del diritto di accedere agli atti amministrativi, e, in particolare, alla cartella clinica stabilmente detenuta da un ente ecclesiastico che esercita attività sanitaria in regime ospedaliero).
TAR PUGLIA - LECCE SEZ. II - sentenza 5 ottobre 2012 (sulla sussistenza o meno del diritto di accedere agli atti amministrativi, e, in particolare, alla cartella clinica stabilmente detenuta da un ente ecclesiastico che esercita attività sanitaria in regime ospedaliero).
IMU per Enti non commerciali
CONSIGLIO DI STATO SEZ. CONSULTIVA PER GLI ATTI NORMATIVI - parere 4 ottobre 2012 (esprime parere sfavorevole in ordine allo schema di regolamento predisposto dal Ministero dell'economia e delle finanze ai fini della determinazione dell’Imposta municipale propria - IMU per gli enti non commerciali).
CONSIGLIO DI STATO SEZ. CONSULTIVA PER GLI ATTI NORMATIVI - parere 4 ottobre 2012 (esprime parere sfavorevole in ordine allo schema di regolamento predisposto dal Ministero dell'economia e delle finanze ai fini della determinazione dell’Imposta municipale propria - IMU per gli enti non commerciali).
Diritto all’istruzione
dei disabili gravi
TAR LAZIO - ROMA SEZ. III BIS - sentenza 3 ottobre 2012 (sulla sussistenza o meno dell’obbligo dell’Amministrazione scolastica di garantire il diritto all’istruzione del disabile grave attraverso adeguato personale di sostegno per un numero di ore pari almeno ad un’intera cattedra).
TAR LAZIO - ROMA SEZ. III BIS - sentenza 3 ottobre 2012 (sulla sussistenza o meno dell’obbligo dell’Amministrazione scolastica di garantire il diritto all’istruzione del disabile grave attraverso adeguato personale di sostegno per un numero di ore pari almeno ad un’intera cattedra).
Trasferimento per assistenza a familiare portatore di handicap
CONSIGLIO DI STATO SEZ. IV - sentenza 18 ottobre 2012 (sull’applicabilità o meno in via retroattiva, anche al personale di Polizia, delle recenti modifiche alla disciplina prevista per ottenere il trasferimento del dipendente per assistere un familiare portatore di handicap - che hanno previsto il venir meno del requisito della continuità ed esclusività dell'assistenza - a fattispecie non ancora definite).
CONSIGLIO DI STATO SEZ. IV - sentenza 18 ottobre 2012 (sull’applicabilità o meno in via retroattiva, anche al personale di Polizia, delle recenti modifiche alla disciplina prevista per ottenere il trasferimento del dipendente per assistere un familiare portatore di handicap - che hanno previsto il venir meno del requisito della continuità ed esclusività dell'assistenza - a fattispecie non ancora definite).
Servizio sanitario nazionale
CORTE COSTITUZIONALE - sentenza 26 ottobre 2012 (sui presupposti necessari per limitare il diritto alla libertà di scelta del luogo di cura in tutto il territorio nazionale; dichiara illegittima una norma della Regione Puglia che precludeva alle ASL regionali la possibilità di stipulare accordi contrattuali con strutture sanitarie private aventi sede legale fuori dal territorio regionale, relativamente all’erogazione di prestazioni riabilitative domiciliari).
CORTE COSTITUZIONALE - sentenza 26 ottobre 2012 (sui presupposti necessari per limitare il diritto alla libertà di scelta del luogo di cura in tutto il territorio nazionale; dichiara illegittima una norma della Regione Puglia che precludeva alle ASL regionali la possibilità di stipulare accordi contrattuali con strutture sanitarie private aventi sede legale fuori dal territorio regionale, relativamente all’erogazione di prestazioni riabilitative domiciliari).
California Court of Appeal, 10/29/2012
People v. Leal, No. A131366
In defendant's conviction for marijuana possession for sale, trial court's imposition of a condition of probation restricting medical use of marijuana under the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 and the Medical Marijuana Program is affirmed where consistent with the Lent test, trial court's imposition of the condition was not an abuse of discretion.
People v. Leal, No. A131366
In defendant's conviction for marijuana possession for sale, trial court's imposition of a condition of probation restricting medical use of marijuana under the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 and the Medical Marijuana Program is affirmed where consistent with the Lent test, trial court's imposition of the condition was not an abuse of discretion.
California Court of Appeal, 10/31/2012
Styrene Info. & Research Ctr. v. Office of Envt. Health Hazard Assessment, No. C064301
In plaintiffs' suit seeking to prohibit the inclusion of styrene and vinyl acetate as possible carcinogens on the Proposition 65 list, trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs is affirmed where: 1) Proposition 65 list is limited to chemicals for which it has been determined, either by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) through one of the methods described in Health and Safety Code section 25249.8(b), or through the Labor Code method of adopting findings from authoritative sources, that the chemical is known to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity; 2) because the findings in the IARC monographs on which OEHHA relies to list styrene and vinyl acetate do not satisfy that standard, they cannot properly be included on the list on that basis alone; and 3) because OEHHA does not propose any other basis for including the substances on the list, they must be excluded.
Styrene Info. & Research Ctr. v. Office of Envt. Health Hazard Assessment, No. C064301
In plaintiffs' suit seeking to prohibit the inclusion of styrene and vinyl acetate as possible carcinogens on the Proposition 65 list, trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs is affirmed where: 1) Proposition 65 list is limited to chemicals for which it has been determined, either by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) through one of the methods described in Health and Safety Code section 25249.8(b), or through the Labor Code method of adopting findings from authoritative sources, that the chemical is known to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity; 2) because the findings in the IARC monographs on which OEHHA relies to list styrene and vinyl acetate do not satisfy that standard, they cannot properly be included on the list on that basis alone; and 3) because OEHHA does not propose any other basis for including the substances on the list, they must be excluded.
Young
v. Tri-City Healthcare Dist., No. D059605
In plaintiff's action for a writ of administrative mandate challenging the decision of a hospital board of directors to terminate his medical staff privileges, trial court's grant of defendants' special motion to strike the fifth cause of action, which specifically challenged plaintiff's cause of action for relief from the summary suspension, is reversed and remanded where: 1) the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to continue to entertain the defendants' reconsideration motion, as of the time that the defendant filed its appeal of the October order that reconsidered the original grant of the defendants' motion to strike; and 2) the anti-SLAPP statutory protections do not clearly apply as a matter of law for plaintiff's fifth cause of action
In plaintiff's action for a writ of administrative mandate challenging the decision of a hospital board of directors to terminate his medical staff privileges, trial court's grant of defendants' special motion to strike the fifth cause of action, which specifically challenged plaintiff's cause of action for relief from the summary suspension, is reversed and remanded where: 1) the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to continue to entertain the defendants' reconsideration motion, as of the time that the defendant filed its appeal of the October order that reconsidered the original grant of the defendants' motion to strike; and 2) the anti-SLAPP statutory protections do not clearly apply as a matter of law for plaintiff's fifth cause of action
Court of Appeals of New York, 10/30/2012
Coleman v, Daines, No. 152
In plaintiff's section 1983 suit alleging that the Commissioner of the New York City Human Resources Administration and the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health violated Social Services Law section 133 and her constitutional right to due process by failing to give her notice of the availability of "temporary assistance" benefits at the time of her application, the Appellate Division's reversal of the Supreme Court's dismissal of the complaint on grounds of mootness and failure to exhaust administrative remedies is affirmed where: 1) since defendants' policy of not informing applicants of the availability of temporary Medicaid assistance in the form of personal care attendant services is alleged to have applied to all similarly situated Medicaid claimants who sought benefits under the same statutory provision as plaintiff, this issue is "likely to recur"; 2) based on the potential ramifications from delays in providing critical benefits and the relatively brief nature of the violation, the question is substantial and will typically evade judicial review; and 3) accepting as true the assertion that defendants maintain policies and procedures as alleged, plaintiff's pursuit of the claims through the administrative process would have been futile.
Coleman v, Daines, No. 152
In plaintiff's section 1983 suit alleging that the Commissioner of the New York City Human Resources Administration and the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health violated Social Services Law section 133 and her constitutional right to due process by failing to give her notice of the availability of "temporary assistance" benefits at the time of her application, the Appellate Division's reversal of the Supreme Court's dismissal of the complaint on grounds of mootness and failure to exhaust administrative remedies is affirmed where: 1) since defendants' policy of not informing applicants of the availability of temporary Medicaid assistance in the form of personal care attendant services is alleged to have applied to all similarly situated Medicaid claimants who sought benefits under the same statutory provision as plaintiff, this issue is "likely to recur"; 2) based on the potential ramifications from delays in providing critical benefits and the relatively brief nature of the violation, the question is substantial and will typically evade judicial review; and 3) accepting as true the assertion that defendants maintain policies and procedures as alleged, plaintiff's pursuit of the claims through the administrative process would have been futile.
California
Appellate Districts
FAMILY LAW
In re Maricela H., No. B238635
Juvenile court's decision declaring a minor a dependent of the court after finding the minor was at risk of suffering serious physical harm "as a result of the failure or inability of his or her parent or guardian to adequately supervise or protect the child" under the first jurisdictional prong of Welfare and Institutions Code section 300(b), is affirmed where the parental conduct to which the jurisdictional provision refers does not require parental neglect and substantial evidence supports the finding
In re Maricela H., No. B238635
Juvenile court's decision declaring a minor a dependent of the court after finding the minor was at risk of suffering serious physical harm "as a result of the failure or inability of his or her parent or guardian to adequately supervise or protect the child" under the first jurisdictional prong of Welfare and Institutions Code section 300(b), is affirmed where the parental conduct to which the jurisdictional provision refers does not require parental neglect and substantial evidence supports the finding
CONTRACTS,
HEALTH LAW, CIVIL PROCEDURE, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
Young v. Tri-City Healthcare Dist., No. D059605
In plaintiff's action for a writ of administrative mandate challenging the decision of a hospital board of directors to terminate his medical staff privileges, trial court's grant of defendants' special motion to strike the fifth cause of action, which specifically challenged plaintiff's cause of action for relief from the summary suspension, is reversed and remanded where: 1) the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to continue to entertain the defendants' reconsideration motion, as of the time that the defendant filed its appeal of the October order that reconsidered the original grant of the defendants' motion to strike; and 2) the anti-SLAPP statutory protections do not clearly apply as a matter of law for plaintiff's fifth cause of action.
Young v. Tri-City Healthcare Dist., No. D059605
In plaintiff's action for a writ of administrative mandate challenging the decision of a hospital board of directors to terminate his medical staff privileges, trial court's grant of defendants' special motion to strike the fifth cause of action, which specifically challenged plaintiff's cause of action for relief from the summary suspension, is reversed and remanded where: 1) the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to continue to entertain the defendants' reconsideration motion, as of the time that the defendant filed its appeal of the October order that reconsidered the original grant of the defendants' motion to strike; and 2) the anti-SLAPP statutory protections do not clearly apply as a matter of law for plaintiff's fifth cause of action.
U.S. 2nd Circuit
Court of Appeals
CONSTITUTIONAL
LAW, EDUCATION LAW, CIVIL PROCEDURE, CIVIL RIGHTS, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW
Coollick v. Hughes, No. 10-5248
In 1983 action against defendant Superintendent of Connecticut Technical High School System alleging deprivation of procedural due process rights when defendant eliminated plaintiff's guidance counselor position, the denial of defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is reversed and remanded, where: 1) defendant's conduct did not violate plaintiff's rights because there is no due process violation where pre-deprivation notice is provided and deprivation issue can by fully remedied through the grievance procedures provided for in a collective bargaining agreement; and 2) defendant is entitled to qualified immunity.
Coollick v. Hughes, No. 10-5248
In 1983 action against defendant Superintendent of Connecticut Technical High School System alleging deprivation of procedural due process rights when defendant eliminated plaintiff's guidance counselor position, the denial of defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is reversed and remanded, where: 1) defendant's conduct did not violate plaintiff's rights because there is no due process violation where pre-deprivation notice is provided and deprivation issue can by fully remedied through the grievance procedures provided for in a collective bargaining agreement; and 2) defendant is entitled to qualified immunity.
CONVEGNI
Ruolo e
funzione dell’amministratore di sostegno. Un quadro introduttivo, in programma presso il Piccolo
Cottolengo Don Orione(Viale Caterina da Forlì, 19, ore 14.30-16.30).
Minori e famiglie in
difficoltà, a Genova un convegno per prevenire gli allontanamenti
mercoledì 7 novembre a Genova presso la
Sala Piramide dell’Agenzia delle Entrate (via Fiume, 2), il convegno
organizzato da Federsanità ANCI Liguria, in collaborazione con Regione Liguria
e Forum del Terzo Settore, dal titolo “Diritto di crescere
in famiglia. Prevenire gli allontanamenti lavorando sulle relazioni”.
http://www.genova24.it/2012/11/minori-e-famiglie-in-difficolta-a-genova-un-convegno-per-prevenire-gli-allontanamenti-42302/
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento